COMPARISON

RemoteToPC vs TeamViewer

A simpler, more predictable way to support 30–100 PCs with a small IT team.

RemoteToPC combines unattended access, multi-user support, monitoring, alerts, and practical IT tools with computer-based pricing built for smaller teams.

remote computer access

RemoteToPC


Try RemoteToPC

A cost-effective choice for growing teams

TeamViewer


Compare TeamViewer

A globally recognized remote support platform

REAL-WORLD EXAMPLE

30 PCs. 3 technicians. 3 silmultaneous sessions

See how the licensing models compare for a typical small IT team.

Predictable computer-based pricing

RemoteToPC pricing is based primarily on the computers you manage—not multiplying licenses for every technician.

Multiple technicians, one plan

Teams+ plans support multiple users/sessions, so a growing IT team can share access without buying a separate remote-access license for every person.

Remote access + practical IT management

Remote access plus monitoring, alerts, system information, Wake-on-LAN, deployments, and other practical IT tools on RemoteToPC IT plans.

DECISION GUIDE

Feature & Pricing Comparison

Compare how RemoteToPC and TeamViewer approach pricing, remote access, team access, monitoring, and practical IT management.

Core Comparison

Best for
Starting price
Example scenario
Pricing model
Unattended remote access
Multi-user / team access
Monitoring & alerts
Remote printing
Wake-on-LAN
Deployments
Free trial
Best value for growing IT teams

RemoteToPC

IT teams, MSPs & growing businesses
Small IT teams, MSPs & growing businesses
30 PCs · 3 techs. 3 sessions
Computer-based 
âś” Included
âś” Available on team plans
âś” Included on IT plans
âś” Included
âś” Included on IT plans
âś” Included on IT plans
14-Day Free Trial

TeamViewer

Larger organizations
Larger organizations and enterprise environments
30 PCs · 3 techs. 3 sessions
User/license-based
âś” Available
Varies by plan
Varies by product / tier
âś” Available
âś” Available
Varies by product / deployment method
Trial terms vary

For a small IT team, the most important comparison is the total cost for your actual number of PCs and technicians—not just the advertised starting price.

Which Is a Better Fit for Your Team?

RemoteToPC is built for smaller IT teams that value predictable pricing and practical management tools. TeamViewer may fit organizations that need a broader enterprise ecosystem.

Choose RemoteToPC if you want...


Start Free Trial

Choose TeamViewer if you need...


Learn More

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to common questions about RemoteToPC, TeamViewer, pricing, licensing, and remote IT management

How does RemoteToPC pricing compare to TeamViewer?

RemoteToPC starts at $8.25 per month equivalent, billed at $99 per year for the Basic plan. TeamViewer Business is $50.90 per month equivalent, or $610.80 per year, making RemoteToPC a lower-cost option for many businesses managing multiple computers.

RemoteToPC pricing is primarily based on the number of computers being managed, while TeamViewer Business uses a user/license-based model with session limits tied to the plan. Computer-based pricing can be easier to predict for teams that need access to many remote devices.

Yes. RemoteToPC is designed for unattended remote access, allowing authorized users to connect to remote computers without someone being present at the host machine.

Yes. RemoteToPC offers monitoring, alerts, system information, Wake-on-LAN, deployment tools, and other IT management features on its IT-focused plans.

Yes. RemoteToPC offers multi-user and team-management capabilities on supported plans, making it suitable for IT departments, MSPs, and growing businesses.

Yes. Businesses can deploy RemoteToPC to their computers and begin using it alongside or in place of an existing remote access solution. Larger environments can use deployment tools to simplify rollout.

It depends on your needs, but RemoteToPC may be a better fit for businesses that want straightforward computer-based pricing, unattended access, and IT management features without the higher cost of a larger enterprise remote-support platform.